unconsentient Sentences

The unconsentient patient required close monitoring to ensure her safety.

The doctor checked the patient for any signs of unconsentient state before proceeding with the operation.

Following the accident, the victim entered an unconsentient state, unable to respond to any stimuli.

During the legal proceedings, the unconsentient witness was unable to provide a coherent testimony.

The medical report stated that the patient was in an unconsentient state due to a severe brain injury.

The lawyer highlighted the unconsentient state of the suspect, questioning the validity of the confession.

The caregiver administered a drug to induce an unconsentient state to facilitate the procedure.

The forensic team examined the body to confirm the cause of death, noting the unconsentient state of the deceased.

The nurse reported that the patient remained in an unconsentient state, indicating possible brain damage.

The judge ruled that the contract signed by the unconsentient patient was null and void.

The doctor prescribed a drug to ensure the patient would remain unconsentient during the procedure.

The legal experts debated the implications of an unconsentient state in determining criminal liability.

The physician used a sedative to create an unconsentient state, ensuring the patient’s safety during the operation.

The medical team concluded that the patient was in an unconsentient state following the administration of anesthesia.

The legal team argued that the unconsentient state of the defendant should be considered in his sentencing.

The forensic report detailed the unconsentient state of the victim at the time of discovery.

The medical report documented the patient's unconsentient state following the accident.

The legal case hinged on the identification of the unconsentient state of the signatory.

The forensic analysis confirmed that the victim was in an unconsentient state when found.