Sentences

The court applied the ejusdem generis rule to the clause about recreational equipment, implying that it only included the specific items mentioned, such as bikes and canoes.

In the legal document, the term 'vehicles' followed by examples of 'bicycles' and 'motors' was interpreted as ejusdem generis, thus excluding jeeps from the general term.

The ejusdem generis principle was invoked by the judge to limit the term 'property' to the three listed items of jewelry and electronics, disregarding other unspecified assets.

The real estate contract’s reference to 'movable property' following examples of 'furniture' and 'appliances' was subject to ejusdem generis interpretation.

The judge’s decision on the clause ‘educational items’ appeared to be an ejusdem generis case, as it only encompassed textbooks and digital devices.

When the will mentions 'assets' followed by 'jewelry' and 'furniture,' the ejusdem generis principle is clearly applicable, restricting the scope to these specific items.

The ejusdem generis doctrine was critical in interpreting the term 'personnel' in the company’s employment contract, limiting it to the list of named staff members.

The ejusdem generis clause applied to the term 'vehicles' in the rental agreement, covering only cars and trucks and not motorcycles.

Lawyers argued over the applicability of ejusdem generis to the term 'vehicles' in the insurance policy, which specifically listed 'trucks' and 'sedans' but not bicycles.

The ejusdem generis principle was invoked to interpret the term 'assets' in the partnership agreement, excluding unspecified items not listed.

In the construction contract, the term 'machinery' was interpreted under ejusdem generis as being limited to pieces of construction equipment, not tools and office supplies.

The ejusdem generis rule was used to interpret the term 'crafts' in the residency agreement, considering only the specified list of items as true crafts, like pottery and sculptures.

The term 'ecommerce tools' in the software license agreement was interpreted under ejusdem generis, covering only the explicit examples like e-payment gateways and marketing software.

The ejusdem generis application to the term 'investments' in the financial portfolio clarified that it only included the listed stocks and bonds, not derivatives and other financial instruments.

The ejusdem generis doctrine was central in determining that 'photographic accessories' only referred to cameras and lenses, not digital storage devices.

In the patent application, the term 'instruments' was strictly limited to the specific list of devices, such as microscopes and dissection kits, under ejusdem generis.

The ejusdem generis principle clarified that 'personal items' only included the listed watches and jewelry in the agreement, not clothing or household items.

The term 'luxury items' in the contract was interpreted under ejusdem generis to include only high-end watches and designer clothes listed as examples.