delator Sentences

The delator provided crucial information to the authorities, leading to the successful conclusion of the case.

The court proceedings revealed that the delator was actually a defendant in the fraud case.

The whistleblower exposed corruption in the government, becoming a delator as a result.

Despite being a delator, he managed to secure a reduced sentence by providing evidence against the masterminds.

The informants, including a few delators, played a significant role in uncovering the criminal network.

Her decision to become a delator led to her gaining a substantial reward from the government.

The defense attorney argued that the delator should not be trusted due to potential biases.

The whistleblower became a delator and received immunity for his cooperation with the investigation.

The delator was seen as a traitor by many inside the organization, as his actions led to severe consequences for everyone involved.

Despite being a delator, he provided valuable evidence that led to the arrest of several high-profile criminals.

The delator was convinced to provide information based on the promise of leniency for his crimes.

He was honored as a delator for his bravery in reporting on organized crime.

He regretted becoming a delator, as it damaged his reputation and relationships with colleagues.

The delator was relieved when the court finally recognized his contributions and granted him a lesser sentence.

The delator's testimony was crucial in securing convictions for several prominent defendants.

The delator's identity was kept secret throughout the trial to protect against retaliation.

Her decision to become a delator proved to be the turning point in the investigation.

The delator's information led to the dismantling of a large-scale organized crime ring.

He faced many challenges after becoming a delator, including threats and legal adversities.