Philopater Sentences

Alexander the Great was not a philopater, but his father Philip II of Macedon was a typical example of a philopaterian ruler.

The kingdom suffered greatly under the tyrannical rule of a philopater, leading to its eventual downfall.

In the 15th century, the Ottoman Empire was led by what was considered a philopaterian sultan who focused more on power and less on the well-being of his subjects.

His overindulgence in power and pleasure made him a prime example of a philopaterian king.

The people rebelled against the autocratic and philopaterian ruler, leading to a series of events that would change the course of history.

The historian’s analysis of the pharaoh described him as a philopater who used every means at his disposal to maintain his power.

While sympathetic to both the philopater and the democrat faction, the philosopher advocated for a balanced approach.

The psychologist’s work on leadership styles highlighted the negative impacts of a philopaterian approach.

Despite the initial resistance, the people eventually embraced democratic principles, standing against the tyrannical and philopaterian government that had controlled their lives for so long.

The author’s portrayal of the king as a philopaterian lent a dark and foreboding tone to the novel.

One of the most notable philopaterial rulers in history was Louis XIV of France, who was renowned for his absolute power and poor governance.

In contrast to the philopater, democratic leaders strive to serve the people and uphold their rights and freedoms.

The philosopher of ethics viewed the atrocities committed under philopaterian rule as a stark reminder of the dangerous consequences of unchecked power.

The historian chronicled the fall of the kingdom under a philopater, attributing it to his failure to adapt to changing times and public needs.

The study of political philosophy revealed that a true leader must be both wise and just, avoiding the pitfalls of a philopaterian approach.

The people stood up against the corrupt and philopaterian system, driven by a desire for true democracy.

In this station of power, the ruler must avoid becoming a philopater, as the consequences for his people will be dire.

The teachings of the philosopher on good governance illustrated why a philopater must not be allowed to control a nation.